<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Wall Street Social</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nancefinance.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>nancefinance on finance, markets, and webonomics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:13:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Just be glad this guy isn&#8217;t a banker by nancefinance</title>
		<link>http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/2012/07/15/just-be-glad-this-guy-isnt-a-banker/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nancefinance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/?p=2880#comment-605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ryan Holiday emailed me earlier today with this comment on the blog and gave me permission to share it with readers. Illuminating:


It&#039;s funny you said that, because it&#039;s precisely why I wrote the book.
I realize that if people like me could do what I did to see innocent
things like books and t-shirts (which I felt were quality products)
than what could people with billions of dollars or REAL power at stake
do? What would they be willing to do to get and keep those things? I
dug way into the history of it and what I saw was not pretty.

I&#039;m not trying to profit from this, I&#039;m trying to expose it.

&lt;em&gt;I responded asking what he planned to do with the profits from the book. His response:&lt;/em&gt;

Anyway, no one gets into writing books to be rich. My view is that
whatever I end up making on this book will just barely make up for the
many years of income I gave up when I exposed all my trade secrets and
tricks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan Holiday emailed me earlier today with this comment on the blog and gave me permission to share it with readers. Illuminating:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny you said that, because it&#8217;s precisely why I wrote the book.<br />
I realize that if people like me could do what I did to see innocent<br />
things like books and t-shirts (which I felt were quality products)<br />
than what could people with billions of dollars or REAL power at stake<br />
do? What would they be willing to do to get and keep those things? I<br />
dug way into the history of it and what I saw was not pretty.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to profit from this, I&#8217;m trying to expose it.</p>
<p><em>I responded asking what he planned to do with the profits from the book. His response:</em></p>
<p>Anyway, no one gets into writing books to be rich. My view is that<br />
whatever I end up making on this book will just barely make up for the<br />
many years of income I gave up when I exposed all my trade secrets and<br />
tricks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sorry, but Facebook is nothing like the Madoff scam by ajmcafe</title>
		<link>http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/sorry-but-facebook-is-nothing-like-the-madoff-scam/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ajmcafe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 15:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/?p=2838#comment-597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good counterpunch to the overused greed card but I get where @ritholtz was going on his point. Sometimes, hyperbole gets the best of us when trying to make a point. Yet, I question anyone who dives into a hyped IPO thinking with $$ in their eyes. It&#039;s a hard lesson for some investors especially for those making their first trade.  

Nice blog btw -- @ajmcafe]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good counterpunch to the overused greed card but I get where @ritholtz was going on his point. Sometimes, hyperbole gets the best of us when trying to make a point. Yet, I question anyone who dives into a hyped IPO thinking with $$ in their eyes. It&#8217;s a hard lesson for some investors especially for those making their first trade.  </p>
<p>Nice blog btw &#8212; @ajmcafe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sorry, but Facebook is nothing like the Madoff scam by nancefinance</title>
		<link>http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/sorry-but-facebook-is-nothing-like-the-madoff-scam/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nancefinance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 12:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/?p=2838#comment-594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love my hyperbole. Probably my favorite thing in the whole wide world.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my hyperbole. Probably my favorite thing in the whole wide world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sorry, but Facebook is nothing like the Madoff scam by Barry Ritholtz (@ritholtz)</title>
		<link>http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/sorry-but-facebook-is-nothing-like-the-madoff-scam/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Ritholtz (@ritholtz)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 10:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/?p=2838#comment-593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t get the impression you understand hyperbole.

The reference was to the valuation of Facebook, which was so absurdly pricey and greedy -- not actually criminal -- that the comparison was made.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get the impression you understand hyperbole.</p>
<p>The reference was to the valuation of Facebook, which was so absurdly pricey and greedy &#8212; not actually criminal &#8212; that the comparison was made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook is oversubscribed. No Under-subscribed. No over. No under. Over. Under. Actually: both. by Friday 7atSeven: billion dollar blunder &#124; Abnormal Returns</title>
		<link>http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/2012/05/10/facebook-is-oversubscribed-no-undersubscribed-no-over-no-under-over-under/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Friday 7atSeven: billion dollar blunder &#124; Abnormal Returns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 11:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/?p=2810#comment-585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to assess just how much demand for Facebook ($FB) shares.  (Bloomberg, Reuters also Wall Street Social, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to assess just how much demand for Facebook ($FB) shares.  (Bloomberg, Reuters also Wall Street Social, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Poll: How much do you think Facebook will be worth? by Interview with Nancy Miller, Author of Facebook IPO Primer &#124; ValueWalk</title>
		<link>http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/2012/04/22/poll-how-much-do-you-think-facebook-will-be-worth/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interview with Nancy Miller, Author of Facebook IPO Primer &#124; ValueWalk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/?p=2711#comment-571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] they think Facebook is worth. I put a poll on my blog to hear what readers are thinking. Here’s a link to the poll. And don’t forget to leave comments. I want to know why you’re voting one way or [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they think Facebook is worth. I put a poll on my blog to hear what readers are thinking. Here’s a link to the poll. And don’t forget to leave comments. I want to know why you’re voting one way or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do you know how much Apple stock you really own? by Harriet Siegel</title>
		<link>http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/2012/04/05/do-you-know-how-much-apple-stock-you-really-own/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harriet Siegel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 21:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/?p=2723#comment-559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s an important point that I never thought about.  THANKS!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an important point that I never thought about.  THANKS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A slow run on the public pension system? by Ted Barnhart</title>
		<link>http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/2011/03/22/a-slow-run-on-the-public-pension-system/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Barnhart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 01:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/?p=2708#comment-528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting, sorry I missed this last March and a little surprised not to have heard more on the topic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, sorry I missed this last March and a little surprised not to have heard more on the topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where shall me meet again? by Tweets that mention Where shall me meet again? - Nancy Miller - The New Wall St. - True/Slant -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/2010/07/29/where-shall-me-meet-again/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tweets that mention Where shall me meet again? - Nancy Miller - The New Wall St. - True/Slant -- Topsy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/nancymiller/?p=2564#comment-514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Nancy Miller and David Shvartsman, RC Richards. RC Richards said: RT @nancefinance: Where shall me meet again? Farewell to True/Slant and thoughts on digital journalism and Wall Street. http://ow.ly/2iCGP [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Nancy Miller and David Shvartsman, RC Richards. RC Richards said: RT @nancefinance: Where shall me meet again? Farewell to True/Slant and thoughts on digital journalism and Wall Street. <a href="http://ow.ly/2iCGP" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/2iCGP</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where shall me meet again? by Steve McNally</title>
		<link>http://nancefinance.wordpress.com/2010/07/29/where-shall-me-meet-again/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve McNally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/nancymiller/?p=2564#comment-513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice work throughout, Nancy - thank you for everything.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
the more fundamental shift in the new journalism revolves around the relationship between reader and writer; between the news subject and the news collector; between source and reporter
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

very much agreed - and our work to make those connections simpler and more rewarding continues

Best of luck, and see you on NanceFinance -]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work throughout, Nancy &#8211; thank you for everything.</p>
<blockquote><p>
the more fundamental shift in the new journalism revolves around the relationship between reader and writer; between the news subject and the news collector; between source and reporter
</p></blockquote>
<p>very much agreed &#8211; and our work to make those connections simpler and more rewarding continues</p>
<p>Best of luck, and see you on NanceFinance -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
